Nothing is Clear Until Our Calling is Clear: Our Special Calling to our Jewish People

September 16, 2018
In every area of life, but especially as we view ourselves to be servants of God, we would do well to gain clarity on one particular issue - "What is my/our calling?"  In other words, considering my identity and the responsibilities to which I am linked by virtue of that identity, who am I called to be and what am I being called to do?
This issue is endlessly discussed in Messianic Jewish circles. Anyone familiar with the movement will know that to be true. But in the last couple of years a new wrinkle has arisen in that discussion, and I would like to at least attempt to iron out this wrinkle in today's blog.
The wrinkle states of the Messianic Jewish Movement, "We are called to all people and not just to the Jewish people." I have even heard it said, "It is a sin for us to focus on the Jewish people." As a credentialed PhD in Missiology (the study of what we as God's people are sent forth to do in the world, from the Latin, missio, meaning "sent"), I must protest. And I must do it loudly. This seemingly harmless bold print statement about what it is we are sent to be and to do can easily erode the entire enterprise of both our being and our doing, leaving us wandering lost in a conceptual wilderness, without a proper calling or direction in harmony with the will of the One who sent us.
Here is where the problem sits. Messianic Jewish congregations and their varied institutional offshoots are absolutely not as effective as they ought to be in serving their primary calling, to expedite the Fullness of Israel. However, it is not pleasant to confront ourselves with our irrelevance and failure in this regard. One of the ways SOME avoid this discomfort is by fudging on the goal, and saying, "Well, God wants us to win everyone." While this is TRUE Joe, it is also true that for some it is a spiritual-sounding cop-out. It dodges our inescapable and primary calling to the Jewish people.
The Jewish people are a unique people. The Bible specifically states "Who is like your people Israel, the one nation on earth whom God went to redeem to be his people, making himself a name and doing for them great and awesome things by driving out before your people, whom you redeemed for yourself from Egypt, a nation and its gods." God tells our people through Amos, "You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities." We are even told, without Divine embarrassment, "This is a people who dwells apart, that shall not be numbered with the nations."
The assumption throughout the Bible is that all humanity is to be conceived of not as an amorphous whole but as Israel and the nations, the Jews and everyone else. Paul says, "What advantage had the Jew and what is the value of circumcision? Much in every way . . ." He goes on in chapter nine of Romans to discuss nine divine distinctives of this people: "They are Israelites, and to them belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises. To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen. "(ESV) These verbs are present tense and the distinctions remain.
What I am stressing is that for the MJ Movement to treat the Jewish people as a unique people is NOT an exercise in chauvinism, although without doubt too many people may be chauvinistic because of factors interior to themselves.
We must not forget that the consummation of God's plans for the universe will not be accomplished apart from two fullnesses being accomplished: the fullness of Israel and the fullness of everyone else. (Notice God's uneven mathematics)! For that reason, and many others, we must NEVER soothe ourselves into being comfortable with any ineffectiveness in reaching our people. Our particular missional calling must become an agenda item so stark that we cannot avoid its light, nor get out from under the shadows it creates. And we must not hide behind some sort of universal calling, no matter how proper, if we are doing so as a means of avoiding the convicting glare of our missional calling.
In the light of that calling many other things become clear. But until that clarity is attained, we will live in a world of missiological murk.
Are there other things we are sent to do besides that are inescapably our responsibility?  Certainly. In my recent book, Converging Destinies: Jews. Christians, and the Mission of God, I define God's mission, what He is up to in the world, in this fashion:
Mission is the Triune God’s extending and expressing Godself within and through the created order in blessing, judgment and redemption so as to call forth a people for God’s own Name from among Israel and the nations, reconciling them to each other, and enlisting them in individual, familial, and communal obedience of faith for the sake of His name in all aspects of relationship with the social, spiritual, and material aspects of the created order. This bi-lateral ekklesia is sent by the Triune God to increase God’s glory through mirroring God’s self-extension and self-expression in its own self-extension and self expression, and in calling others from among Israel and the nations into the life here described and into participation in local communities of the faithful, looking forward to and hastening the consummation of all things in the new heavens and the new earth, free from the curse of sin and death, where righteousness dwells, and all things visible and invisible live together in loving synergistic celebratory harmony to the glory of God, world without end.
Of course we are not going to discuss all of that now. It is just presented as evidence that I fully understand that our tasks are diverse and we must not develop tunnel vision, even of the sanctified variety. Nevertheless, Messianic Jewish communities, their members, and their institutions must neither forget nor obscure their unique and inescapable calling to serve all aspects of the Fullness of Israel.
Far from being a sin, wherever faithfulness to this calling is in evidence, it will be a shining virtue.
But there is a difference between shining and shining ourselves on.
It's time for more shining and less shining on.

6 comments on “Nothing is Clear Until Our Calling is Clear: Our Special Calling to our Jewish People”

  1. I heartily agree that Messianic Jews primary calling is to Klal Israel. Would love to see that. I think a Messianic Jew can and should be a light in their spheres of influence in their jobs and such to gentiles but that doesn't include inviting them to become members of Messianic congregations. Or devoting all attention to serving their spiritual needs at the expense of the Jewish community. I want to see the day when the broader Jewish community thinks Messianic Jews do Judaism better than anybody. Chabad needs some serious competition!

  2. Hey Stu, well spoken as a Fullerite. This continues to be a problem also with Gentiles etc. It is the tension in Acts 15 and Peter and Paul etc. Keep on plugging away. Thanks for your feedback on the Daily Treasues ...huh!!!!!!!!!! God's best!

  3. It seems to me, Stuart, that part of the calculus that you didn't address explicitly is the question of who is envisioned as "we" or "us", in the statements: “We are called to all people and not just to the Jewish people.” and: “It is a sin for us to focus on the Jewish people.”? If we are considering the original Jewish disciples following Rav Yeshua's commandment in Mt.28:19-20, the gentiles were not yet in view -- they would not enter the picture until Acts 10 -- therefore the new disciples in the nations in view were additional Jewish disciples in the Hellenized Jewish diaspora of that era, who would be proper recipients of Rav Yeshua's commands such as in Mt.23:2-3, and Mt.5:17-20 regarding Torah observance and the kingdom of heaven.

    For the later gentile disciples, HaShem appointed a special envoy, Rav Shaul, to disciple them in their own distinctive manner, in accordance with principles outlined in Acts 15 and in his Romans, Galatians, and Corinthians letters. I don't see any solid indications that Jewish disciples as a whole or in general were ever instructed to go make disciples out of all humanity indiscriminately, though one could infer from Avraham's example of "making souls" in Haran before he was circumcised that gentiles should never be excluded from Jewish evangelical or missiological efforts.

    Hence I agree with you that the very nature of the modern movement to restore Jews to true Jewish discipleship under the admor haRav Yeshua ben-Yosef absolutely *must* focus on "the Jew first", as Rav Shaul expressed it to the Roman assemblies. If not us, then whom? If not now, when? I would go so far as to suggest that, unless we present-day Jewish disciples can get right the art of making more Jewish disciples who follow Rav Yeshua's instructions about teaching and living the Torah assiduously, we have no business trying to make gentile ones -- because a greater depth of Torah understanding and ingenuity is required to instruct non-Jews how to learn Torah (as implicit in Acts 15:21), and apply its principles, without being obligated to its specific Jewish praxis.

    I have heard it said that the "sin ... to focus on the Jewish people" is, in fact, a form of racism. To that I must reply: "Then those who assert such an accusation must also view HaShem as a racist". I think they ought to think it out again (to paraphrase the line attributed to Fagin in the musical "Oliver").

  4. I think you are essentially correct. For me it is quite simple. The Jewish people are being largely neglected, are not embracing Yeshua our messiah, and in many but NOT all cases find our congregations to be strange and foreign. I think that all of these matters should be pressing concerns within what was the Messianic Jewish Movement but which has lost the characteristics of such a movement. Now the ideological DNA is too diverse and in many cases derivative, and certainly disconnected with our responsibity to expedite all aspects of the Fullness of Israel.

    When failure to address these matters is ignored, or when these concerns are dismissed as “unspiritual,” nothing good is gained. Similarly when other agendas prevail, such as filling the seats, making a splash, and meeting budget, treated as ends in themselves.

    1. I wonder -- is it actually true that Jewish people are being neglected? It seems to me that they are not neglected, but that they have learned how to avoid missionizing efforts. Certainly if they find congregations of supposed Jews that do not appear very serious or knowledgeable about their Judaism, its praxis, and our communal civilizational continuity, there is no reason to expect them to be favorably impressed toward the rabbi whose teachings they supposedly have embraced. That rabbi would not seem to them qualified as any sort of Jewish messiah. Clearly, no suitable message is being conveyed to convince them that there is value in embracing such a community and its admor. If anything, the message might be read as: "Move along... nothing for you, here".

      How has that come about? Is it a result of ideological contamination or diversification or diversion or dilution? You mentioned "derivative", but I'm not sure what you have in mind as the sources from which something has been derived. Do you mean that the organizations representing "the movement" have assimilated religious ideas, ideals, and praxis from non-Jewish sources -- rather than having matured by reclaiming and reintegrating solely Jewish sources into their constitution and repudiating non-Jewish elements and views previously ingested?

      Nevertheless it seems to me that you are advocating a reformation of character and priorities in many organizations, and their members, if they wish to contribute positively to the restoration, in the present era, of Jewish messianism and discipleship under haRav Yeshua ben-Yosef. With this I wouldn't argue. [:)]

  5. I just discovered a curious reflection of the attitude you discussed in your essay above, Stuart. Apparently liberal/Reform Jews are in large numbers feeling a similar reluctance to accept Jewish particularism. See the article at: [].

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram